Has The American Judicial System Gone Crazy? - Hi Ray, Ed's actions remind me of the main character of a movie someone recommended to me that I watched last night that I think you would like to see, called The Devils (1971) by Ken Russell.

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:07 pm

Has The American Judicial System Gone Crazy?

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

For those of you who do not know me or my writings of Spiritual and Political matters on the Internet let me introduce myself to you. I am a retired California Police Sergeant, living on pension. But first and foremost, I am a Son of the Creator and man of the Sovereign People.

Something is terribly wrong with our society, and no one seems to care about it,. It is a fact that we, each of us are Living, Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood, Sentient, Natural Men and Women of the Sovereign People. WE ARE THE LAW. WE ARE THE CREATORS OF GOVERNMENT.
GOVERNMENT IS OUR SERVANT, NOT OUR MASTER.

We, are Freemen and Women imbued with Unalienable Rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness -- The happiness that comes with living Freely and unencumbered of oppressive fictional conditions imposed upon us via mind control and enforced with the barrel of the gun.

Our Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness is a natural grant from our Creator, The Supreme Infinite Intelligence some call God.

Ed, Elaine, myself, along with historical men such as Jesus of Nazareth and a few others are, and always have been "Strangers in a Bassackward Land." ruled by the Laws of Mammon. Some call it civilized, but when one sets aside one's life-long conditioning and just looks at how civilized men live and have always lived, they will see, Death, Destruction, Wars, Exploitation, and wide-spread redistribution of wealth via scamming and theft.

Look at how America is being destroyed through such means. We are being destroyed by our own consent, cooperation and support. Dumb, huh???

I won't use the word "coward" because such label would condemn our nation as a land of the fearful, and home of the slave.

Each of us have the unalienable right to SELF DEFENSE.

Yet when one has the courage to stand alone to the tyranny he/she perceives to be acting under the "color of law" as Ed and Elaine Brown have done in this case, they are painted as criminals with guns, bombs, booby traps, etc.

Governments rule by force. They rule with the "barrel of the gun". They utilized bombs, tanks, automatic weapons. There are no limitations to their firepower. Waco and Ruby Ridge, serve as Testament to that Truth. Yet they, the servants of the Sovereign People who employ them create "fictitious laws" to rule over "fictitious persons." Such pseudo Law, "Color of Law" is anathema to Natural Law, Common Law, God's Law. Such corporate legislative policies are designed to disarm all and deprive all natural men and women of their means for self-protection via the Unalienable Right to Self-Defense.

It has been said that Satan, the "god" of opposition rules over human society. Sadly for most, that is truism.

Ed and Elaine are seen as outsiders to a general matrix of herdlike, blind conditioned believers who have become enslaved and made to believe they are merely "human resources" to be used at the whim of their "masters", fictional publc servants who have lost their humanity and are thus ruled and rule over others via "intellectual" images.

In the world of civilized Hell, it has been said that those who make the rules win the game. And it is a devilish game that is being played as anyone can plainly see.

Look at what one such public servant did with Ed and Elaine Brown who stood as a man and woman of the Sovereign People, despite the courts great efforts to try them as "Wards of the State" operating as less than full legal capacity.
:
The Ed and Elaine Brown Court Docket reveals the following court determinations. 06/29/2009 149 ORDER as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown denying: 97 Affidavit of Government Fraud, 111 Affidavit of Government Fraud, 112 Affidavit of Facts for Release of Creditors, 117 Affidavit of Truth, 118 Affidavit Demanding Release Due to Refusal of Court and US Attorney to Submit Proof of Jurisdiction, 119 Notice of Objection - re jury sequestration. So Ordered by Judge George Z. Singal. (dae) (Entered: 06/29/2009) Anybody see any balance in the above. Anybody see a STACKED DECK???

Yet the same Judge, the public servant George Z. Singal, REFUSED to address and answer the question of the Brown's Challenge of Jurisdiction over them as Living, Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood, Sentient, Natural Man and Woman, in writing as present law dictates,

See:
05/19/2009 83 * AFFIDAVIT of Edward-Lewis:Brown and Elaine-Alice:Brown of Facts to Challenge Jurisdiction (dae) (Entered: 05/19/2009)

06/15/2009 118 AFFIDAVIT of Edward-Lewis:Brown and Elaine-Alice:Brown Demanding Release Due to Refusal of Court and US Attorney to Submit Proof of Jurisdiction by Edward and Elaine Brown (dae) (Entered: 06/15/2009)

By law, all further proceedings must be stopped until such questions have been answered. Yet anyone "with the eyes to see" can observe the "railroad job" in progress, as true law goes out the window, and Color of Law takes over.

That is the only issue which ought to be addressed. When one group, i.e., public servants have all the guns weapons and tools of tyranny at their disposal, and it becomes a crime for anyone government has set their sights on to take aciton in self-defense, and/or the defense of a loved one, you have hell on earth and Satan, the god of Opposition is alive and well.

I invite you to read the following article "as any American would" written by Margot Sanger Katz of the New Hampshire Monitor staff who is covering the Ed & Elaine Brown Trial.

It is a lesson in the positive imagery of BASSACKWARDS!!!

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Cave Junction Oregon

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'As any American would'
Ed Brown takes the stand in his own defense

By Margot Sanger-Katz
Monitor staff
July 08, 2009 - 7:58 am

By turns confessional and combative, Ed Brown took the stand in his own defense yesterday, telling jurors he built pipe bombs, hung exploding rifle targets, and placed guns and ammunition around his Plainfield home when he knew federal agents were trying to arrest him.

But Brown said that his attempts to arm himself were merely defensive and that he added to his arsenal only after he became convinced U.S. marshals were trying to kill him.

"I was preparing to protect myself and my family, as any American would do," Brown said, describing his intentions. "At that point, pretty much all bets were off."

Brown and his wife, Elaine, have been charged with a combined 11 felonies for their behavior during a nearly nine-month standoff with federal agents. The couple evaded arrest on bench warrants by accumulating weapons, entertaining guests and issuing repeated threats against law enforcement agents. If they are found guilty, the Browns face virtual life sentences.

Prosecutors, who rested their case yesterday, have spent the past week laying out evidence of the many dangers found at the Brown home after the couple's October 2007 arrest by undercover marshals. Among other things, officials found 22 pipe bombs, dozens of gunpowder grenades, 10 booby trap devices and two .50-caliber rifles in the Brown house. The couple had collected night-vision goggles, military flack jackets, radio communication equipment and more than 60,000 rounds of ammunition.

A fingerprint expert testified that prints on several bombs matched Ed Brown's. Several witnesses said they saw Brown carry a gun.

Yesterday, Brown took responsibility for much of that evidence.

"Everything you found, I did, sir," Brown told Assistant U.S. Attorney Arnold Huftalen during cross-examination.

When questioned by his own lawyer, Brown said he had built the pipe bombs, taped nails to the gunpowder grenades, mounted the exploding rifle targets, and staged guns and ammunition himself.

But Brown told the jury his actions were justified given his fears that marshals would kill him and his wife if federal agents were allowed to enter his property. He had long been suspicious of federal power, and his anxiety was only heightened after he heard shots outside his house in June 2007 and learned armored personnel carriers were driving nearby, he said.

Several witnesses testified about the events on June 7, 2007, the day, Brown said, that convinced him of the marshals' bad intentions. Several covert teams of deputy marshals had hidden near the driveway, hoping to arrest Brown when he picked up the mail. Instead, the marshals were discovered by a Brown supporter walking the couple's German shepherd.

Marshals have testified that they fired "less-than-lethal" rounds at Danny Riley, then shocked him with a Taser and took him into custody. Minutes later, a sniper said he saw Ed Brown lift a .50-caliber rifle from the observation deck atop a four-story tower in the house and point it in the direction of that confrontation.

"Frankly, I was scared to death," Brown said. "I ran up to the upper deck. I figured if I'm going to be killed, I'm going to protect myself. So I grabbed that large-caliber gun, and I ran up."

Witnesses at trial have said that a .50-caliber rifle is capable of hitting targets with great accuracy at distances over a mile. A deputy marshal with experience with the weapon told jurors a shot from the gun would "effectively blow a person up."

During cross-examination, Huftalen lifted the three long, heavy .50-caliber rifles that were at the house at the time. Brown was unable to say which one he had used.

**Member** Joined: Apr 25, 2007 Posts: 1235

Hi Ray, Ed's actions remind me of the main character of a movie someone recommended to me that I watched last night that I think you would like to see, called The Devils (1971) by Ken Russell.