Register Here to join the Ed & Elaine Brown email list at MakeTheStand.com!!! It''s fast, easy, and free. Stay informed with the latest live updates from Ed & Elaine and friends -- direct to your email box!!
Privacy: Ed & Elaine and friends do not give ANY of your information to ANYONE
Site Info
Latest Video
08/19/07
Music slide-show with lots of pictures from Live Free or Die 2. Hat tip to "livefreeordie2" from our forums.
07/14/07
Video from the Live Free or Die 2 Concert provided by Danny Riley. Thanks Danny!
6/12/07
WeAreChange.org presents a brand-new video documentary produced this past week!!! It's so new, that I haven't even watched it yet! Check it out!
6/10/07
Supporter Casey Lee Cobb from OpenYourMindsEye.com puts out a new short film that asks these violent, murderous agents used as cannon-fodder by the new world order some serious questions. Will the cowards ever stop enforcing a non-existent law by committing acts of aggression and violence?
06/07/07
Ed is interviewed by a local news station shortly after federal agents and state and local troopers show up on his property. You can hear their helicopter in the background. Ed stresses that it doesn't matter what they do -- it only matters how he responds, as a lawful man.
06/07/07
Ed and Elaine support, Danny Riley from New Jersey, is attacked by federal and state agents in gilly suits. He is first fired upon and hears two shots whiz past his head. Then he is shocked with a taser and tackled onto the ground, kidnapped, drug through the woods, taken to various locations and interrogated, strip-searched, and finally release (indeed, walking a dog with a cup of coffee is not a crime). He's threatened into talking with many many lies.
06/07/07
U.S. Marshall Steve Monier tells more truth than lies this time, and admits multiple times that they grabbed Danny because he discovered them, possibly foiling their plot to attack and kill Ed & Elaine! Know your enemies: this guy is just a spokesperson for the higher-ups. He takes his orders and will probably take the fall if things go back. It is corrupt, cowardice pigs like this guy that give the new world order and other evil movements their strength. These guys are the "useful idiots" and the "cannon-fodder" for tyrants. When will they learn?
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
Re: Show Me The Law -- Or Arrest Me Too!!! (Score: 1) by GSwarthout on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 @ 19:12:48 EDT (User Info | Send a Message)
The 1913 income-tax law passed under the Sixteenth Amendment and upheld by the Supreme Court.
Re: Show Me The Law -- Or Arrest Me Too!!! (Score: 1) by augusta79 on Sunday, October 07, 2007 @ 00:26:46 EDT (User Info | Send a Message)
You're kidding, right?
Your argument is based on the premise that all federal income tax laws are unconstitutional because the Sixteenth Amendment was not officially ratified, or because the State of Ohio was not properly a state at the time of ratification.
This argument has survived over time because proponents mistakenly believe that the courts have refused to address this issue.
Here is the law that you claim you can't "see":
(drumroll...)
The Sixteenth Amendment provides that Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on income, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. U.S. Const. amend. XVI.
The Sixteenth Amendment was ratified by forty states, including Ohio (which became a state in 1803; see Bowman v. United States, 920 F. Supp. 623 n.1 (E.D. Pa. 1995) (discussing the 1953 joint Congressional resolution that confirmed Ohio’s status as a state retroactive to 1803), and issued by proclamation in 1913.
Shortly thereafter, two other states also ratified the Amendment. Under Article V of the Constitution, only three-fourths of the states are needed to ratify an Amendment. There were enough states ratifying the Sixteenth Amendment even without Ohio to complete the number needed for ratification.
Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the income tax laws enacted subsequent to ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R., 240 U.S. 1 (1916). Since that time, the courts have consistently upheld the constitutionality of the federal income tax.
In November 2004, the Justice Department filed a civil injunction complaint against William Benson, asking the court to bar Mr. Benson from selling a fraudulent tax scheme and from unlawfully interfering with the Internal Revenue Service. Mr. Benson’s tax scheme relies on the frivolous position that the Sixteenth Amendment was never ratified. See http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/txdv04752.htm; see also 2004 TNT 223-20 (Nov. 16, 2004).
The IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2005-19, 2005-1 C.B. 819, which discusses this frivolous argument in more detail, warning taxpayers of the consequences of attempting to pursue a claim on these grounds.
Dozens more examples debunking every single tax protester myth here:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf
I like a good discussion, but this one is dead in the water. You can't pretend to be exempt from any laws because you don't agree with them, just as you'll never float away because you've decided to stop believing in gravity.
Register Here
